Sunday, May 17, 2009

Camera Insade Vargina

(Post No. 13)


many messages invisible pass under our noses? Infinity, perhaps.
Each sign may be a symbol and each symbol can communicate concepts is also the context in which communication is that, ultimately, precise, more or less clearly, the meaning of what you want communicate.
These are difficult issues? I do not know, but surely you are considering a kind of "treasure hunt" to which many can not resist. Almost every person, in fact, is fascinated by the mysteries and captivated by the desire to solve them: this is one of the main motives that drove humanity to evolve technologically over the millennia.
It's no wonder that, at certain periods of history, the occult and science were visibly in a state of mutual admixture within a single set of studies and that the Newton cultivate both these "disciplines" with the same dedication (it alludes to his fervent interest for alchemy to chemistry before this assurgesse): science, in fact, before that, it evolves from the magical mysticism, without interruption, through an intermediate stage of development known as "pseudoscience." This progress, however, is not exactly epic, and thus may occur more or less conspicuously, at any time and every time they are invented machines that are able to detect the presence of phenomena not previously detected as unknown or time or only imagined as likely to exist but never observed in practice.
Where we want to go with these "strange" speeches? Essentially no preconceived position: si vuole semplicemente tenere la mente aperta ad ogni cosa curiosa e, tanto la simbologia in genere quanto la scrittura in particolare, di cose di questo tipo ne hanno veramente moltissime, proprio perché stanno alla radice di tutto lo scibile umano quali mezzi utilizzati per il trasferimento e la conservazione delle informazioni.
Ma quali informazioni si possono ottenere quando, dal passato o dal presente, ci giungano segni che non si sa se siano decorazioni o simboli, oppure scritture con caratteri del tutto ignoti o noti ma ordinati in modo apparentemente privo di significato? Burle o verità nascoste?
Basti ricordare, per esempio, i pittoreschi casi del Manoscritto di Voynich ( http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manoscritto_Voynich ) or the strange code Rohonczi ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohonc_Codex ), just to stay, good, looking at historical issues to talk about frogs. There would, in fact, similar but far more technology and much less striking, ranging from radio communications concealed in the redshift white noise through the techniques of modulation and frequency hopping dissipation spectrum ( http: / / en.wikipedia.org / wiki / Frequency-hopping_spread_spectrum ), to attempts to find posts by chaotic sequences of data from from any source, using high-tech equipment and decoders, as they say, sometimes a high target ( http://www.wavecom.ch/ ). Then pull the money end of this speech? If there was someone interested in deepening the topics in question, this post would be a constructive proposal for discussion and meeting place for the possible future establishment of scientific and cultural association that deals with language-mathematics, programming, game theory , statistics, secure communications over the air, etc.., that is, as they say in common parlance, of "codes".

0 comments:

Post a Comment