much if they are called on this type of contention: some spoke of the game, other scientists, and others in art, but in the end, it seems that they all are found agree in saying that chess, after all, are "just" a sport. Why? It 'obvious: the game, chess is not surely have a carefree nor the atheist, science, then they do not have an unexplored field in front of and behind certainties, and finally, art, chess in no way a preference for the form, since they have only the substance of things, to victory in the struggle for which they are subject. It remains, therefore, that define a cerebral sport, something that engages the mind in continual and exaggerated efforts to achieve an impeccable logical analysis of various structures of the game in order to achieve mathematical certainty to act in such a way as to avoid defeat.
It 's true, it is incredibly funny: you play to win at chess, however, if the match is conducted in a logical flawlessly on both sides, it would only equal as everything in them, is obvious. So the truth is that in chess you pay any carelessness, even the slightest, which is why the failures can easily stimulate the desire to improve.
of interesting books that teach chess to think logically, I have seen many, but what remains is more useful and comforting to me is "Strategy and Tactics in Chess," Enrico Paoli: This text has a clear and a systematic way, for me, almost absolute. However, if you wanted to know more, just ask and if you wanted to just try to play with someone, I think http://www.scacchisti.it/ may be, for anyone, a good start.
Note in the picture ... the time (: clock Lot), space (: the board), the material (namely pedestrians and pieces) ... immortalized in the position of the variant Nimzowitsch French defense after 6. bc.
It 's true, it is incredibly funny: you play to win at chess, however, if the match is conducted in a logical flawlessly on both sides, it would only equal as everything in them, is obvious. So the truth is that in chess you pay any carelessness, even the slightest, which is why the failures can easily stimulate the desire to improve.
of interesting books that teach chess to think logically, I have seen many, but what remains is more useful and comforting to me is "Strategy and Tactics in Chess," Enrico Paoli: This text has a clear and a systematic way, for me, almost absolute. However, if you wanted to know more, just ask and if you wanted to just try to play with someone, I think http://www.scacchisti.it/ may be, for anyone, a good start.
Note in the picture ... the time (: clock Lot), space (: the board), the material (namely pedestrians and pieces) ... immortalized in the position of the variant Nimzowitsch French defense after 6. bc.
0 comments:
Post a Comment